Use this checker to identify published admission conditions that are clearly met, clearly not met, or still unknown before you spend money on an application.
Use a value on the same scale as the published minimum.
No account required.
Screen hard constraints first
Degree level and duration, prerequisite subjects or credits, language scores, required documents and application timing are often easier to verify than subjective admission competitiveness.
Unknown is a useful result
If the programme does not clearly publish a condition, mark it Unknown rather than guessing. That gives you a focused question for the admissions office or official programme page.
Do not turn the checklist into an admission probability
Meeting published minimums can make an application eligible for review without making admission likely. Capacity, ranking, portfolio quality, interviews and holistic selection can still matter.
Verify the governing ruleThis page explains a planning method, not a universal licensing rule. If your credential has a mandatory total, category, provider, or reporting rule, use the issuing authority as the final source.
Important: This is a planning aid. Universities, scholarship providers, immigration authorities, recognition bodies and professional regulators control their own decisions and changing requirements.